AI Agent Readiness Audit

Agent Checker

agentchecker.ai
Audited August 7, 2026
16/17
Agentic tests
30/30
Readiness checks
0
Critical
1
Warnings
46
Passed
3
Quick Wins

Summary

Agent Checker offers AI agent readiness audits for websites. It sends a real AI agent through a live site to identify where it fails during search, sign-up, and checkout flows, then provides actionable fixes. Customers are website owners and agencies, with white-label options available. Full audits start from £19.

Categories

Navigation
92/100
Form Handling
100/100
Task Completion
98/100

Agent Readiness

All agent-readiness checks passed

Discoverability11/11Understanding10/10Operability17/17Trust & Security15/15

Discoverability

Can agents find your site and its capabilities?

Checks against: Emerging Agent Manifests · Key Pages & Crawlability · Google Lighthouse Agentic

11 pass2 n/a
  • WebMCP / agent-protocol tools discovered
  • /.ai.txt advisory file
  • /llms.txt guide for AI agents
  • /llms.txt opens with an H1 title
  • /llms.txt has a summary blockquote
  • /llms.txt lists key pages as markdown links
  • AGENTS.md operating guide for agents
  • /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727)
  • Agent Skills index
  • Key pages discovered
  • llms.txt follows recommendations
  • Lighthouse Agentic Browsing run
    Lighthouse Agentic Browsing audits ran.
  • ·
    /agents.txt manifest
    No /agents.txt or /agent-manifest.txt — emerging spec, optional.

Understanding

Can agents understand your content?

Checks against: Google AI Search · AI Search & Structured Data · Open Agent Protocols · Key Pages & Crawlability

10 pass4 n/a
  • Homepage content is server-rendered
  • Single H1 on homepage
  • Heading hierarchy is intact
  • Semantic landmark elements
  • <html lang> attribute
  • Internal links on homepage
  • DOM size is reasonable
  • Markdown content negotiation
  • Key pages have <title> and <h1>
  • Key pages are server-rendered
  • ·
    Images have alt text
    No <img> tags on the homepage.
  • ·
    Data tables use <thead>
    No <table> elements on the homepage.
  • ·
    Images have explicit dimensions
    No <img> tags on the homepage.
  • ·
    Cookie banner does not block crawlers
    No cookie banner detected on the homepage.

Operability

Can agents actually operate the page?

Checks against: AI Search & Structured Data · Core Web Vitals · Accessibility (WCAG 2.2) · Google Lighthouse Agentic

17 pass6 n/a
  • Form fields have labels
  • Cumulative Layout Shift
  • Time to First Byte
  • Overall accessibility score
  • Buttons have an accessible name
  • Links have a discernible name
  • `[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes
  • `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled
  • `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values
  • `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles
  • `[role]` values are valid
  • `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>`
  • Document has a `<title>` element
  • Accessibility tree is agent-navigable
  • Accessibility tree is well-formed
  • WebMCP schemas are valid
  • Cumulative Layout Shift
  • WebMCP tools registered
    Lists the [WebMCP tools](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/webmcp) registered at the time of analysis.
  • ·
    Forms mark required fields
    1 form(s) on the homepage, none collecting contact or account data (no email / tel / password / number / url inputs).
  • ·
    Forms use autocomplete attributes
    1 form(s) on the homepage, none collecting contact or account data (no email / tel / password / number / url inputs).
  • ·
    Form errors are accessible
    1 form(s) on the homepage, none collecting contact or account data (no email / tel / password / number / url inputs).
  • ·
    Form fields publish validation hints
    1 form(s) on the homepage, none collecting contact or account data (no email / tel / password / number / url inputs).
  • ·
    WebMCP form coverage
    Consider adding [WebMCP](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/webmcp) annotations to the forms listed below. This helps AI agents identify and interact with these forms more reliably.

Trust & Security

Can agents safely transact?

Checks against: Open Agent Protocols · Web Security & Trust

15 pass
  • Web Bot Auth signature header
  • OAuth authorization server metadata
  • OAuth protected-resource metadata
  • Site is served over HTTPS
  • http:// redirects to https://
  • TLS certificate is not near expiry
  • HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header
  • Content-Security-Policy header
  • Click-jacking protection
  • MIME-sniff protection
  • Referrer-Policy header
  • No tech-stack disclosure in headers
  • CDN detected
  • No mixed-content references
  • Homepage shows no error output

WebMCP

WebMCP is implemented

2 pass 4 n/a

WebMCP runtime API (navigator.modelContext)

  • WebMCP tools registered with the browser
  • Registered tools are well-formed (name, description, inputSchema)
  • WebMCP tools exposed to agents
    3: start_agent_readiness_check, list_supported_standards, get_pricing

Tool catalog signpost (/.well-known/webmcp.json)

  • Tool catalog signpost published
    2 tool(s) published at /.well-known/webmcp.json (spec webmcp/0.1). The catalog is a community convention signpost, not part of the WebMCP standard.
  • Catalog tools are well-formed (name + description)
    All 2 tool(s) declare a name and description.
  • WebMCP tools exposed to agents
    2: read_llms_txt, read_page_as_markdown
About the WebMCP standard Spec and examples: github.com/webmachinelearning/webmcp.

AI Discoverability

GPTBot
ChatGPT-User
ClaudeBot
anthropic-ai
PerplexityBot
Google-Extended
Applebot-Extended
meta-externalagent
Discoverable, your content can be indexed by this AI platform
Blocked, this crawler is fully blocked from indexing
Partial, some content pages are blocked from being indexed

AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity use these crawlers to index your content so it can appear in AI-generated answers. This only affects discoverability, agents that browse the site like regular users are not restricted by robots.txt.

Agent Accessibility

AI agent successfully loaded and navigated the website PASS

Key Findings

Customer Evidence

medium impact
6/10

The Customers page at /customers shows 6 real brand logos: Multiply, GEO, AnyVan, SelectSpecs.com, and 2 others. The page includes benchmark data: 1,000 sites scanned, 53/100 average agent-readiness score. The page notes 'we publish customer results only when the customer has given us their own numbers to publish' which is transparent. However, there are no named testimonials with specific outcomes or case studies visible. The 'What we have measured' section shows aggregate data rather than individual customer stories.

Recommendation: Add 2-3 named testimonials with specific outcomes (e.g. 'After fixing the 3 issues Agent Checker found, our agent conversion rate increased by X%') to strengthen social proof beyond logo display.
Screenshot for Customer Evidence

Full Evidence

Customer Evidence

medium impact
6/10

The Customers page at /customers shows 6 real brand logos: Multiply, GEO, AnyVan, SelectSpecs.com, and 2 others. The page includes benchmark data: 1,000 sites scanned, 53/100 average agent-readiness score. The page notes 'we publish customer results only when the customer has given us their own numbers to publish' which is transparent. However, there are no named testimonials with specific outcomes or case studies visible. The 'What we have measured' section shows aggregate data rather than individual customer stories.

Recommendation: Add 2-3 named testimonials with specific outcomes (e.g. 'After fixing the 3 issues Agent Checker found, our agent conversion rate increased by X%') to strengthen social proof beyond logo display.
Screenshot for Customer Evidence

Company Information

medium impact
8/10

The About page at /about clearly identifies: Company name: CodeHawks Limited, trading as Agent Checker. Location: Registered in England and Wales. Contact: hello@agentchecker.ai (visible in footer and support page). The page explains why they built the product and their mission. No individual founders or team members are named, but the company is clearly identifiable with a working contact route via email and live chat.

Recommendation: Consider adding founder names or a small team section to increase trust and personalize the brand. The company is identifiable but lacks individual faces/names.
Screenshot for Company Information

Feature Discovery

high impact
9/10

The Features page (/how-it-works) clearly describes 5 specific capabilities: (1) Real agent testing - a real AI agent drives a real browser through the live site covering search, sign-up, and checkout; (2) Pass rate at a glance - overall agent-readiness score; (3) Actionable report - prioritised findings with step-by-step replay of the AI agent browsing; (4) Category breakdown - findings organized by category with top recommended fixes and high-impact findings; (5) PDF report and live agent view showing action history (47 steps). Features are described concretely with specific outcomes, not just slogans.

Recommendation: Features are well described. Consider adding a dedicated comparison table showing what the Quick Check covers vs. the Full Audit to help agents distinguish the two tiers faster.
Screenshot for Feature Discovery

Integrations

medium impact
9/10

The Integrations page at /integrations clearly lists what is supported: Webhooks, REST API, MCP server, Analytics, Email alerts, and White-label reports. Importantly, there is a dedicated 'What we do not integrate with yet' section that explicitly lists Slack, Zapier and Make, and Google Sheets/Notion/Jira as NOT yet supported. This is highly transparent and agent-friendly. Slack is definitively NOT supported yet. The page is browsable and definitive.

Recommendation: The transparency about missing integrations is excellent. Consider adding a roadmap timeline or upvote mechanism for the 'not yet' integrations so users can signal demand.
Screenshot for Integrations

Security & Compliance

medium impact
9/10

A dedicated Security page at /security exists with 'Certifications and compliance, straight answers'. UK GDPR and EU GDPR: Yes (CodeHawks Limited is a UK data controller). SOC 2 and ISO 27001: 'Not certified' - explicitly stated with 'We hold neither a SOC 2 report nor an ISO 27001 certificate today, and we would rather say so than leave you guessing.' The page also covers 'What we hold' data section. The transparency about what they are NOT certified for is commendable and agent-friendly.

Recommendation: The honest disclosure of non-certification is excellent. Consider adding a target date or roadmap for SOC 2 certification to reassure enterprise buyers.
Screenshot for Security & Compliance

Value Proposition

high impact
10/10

The hero headline clearly states 'AI agents are already trying to buy from your site. Find out why they fail.' The subheadline explains: 'Agent Checker sends a real AI agent driving a real browser through your live site: search, sign-up, checkout. It shows you every place the agent gets stuck, what that is costing you, and exactly how to fix it.' The product category (AI Agent Readiness Auditing) is explicitly labeled above the headline. The product is clearly for website owners and agencies. Value proposition is immediately clear without scrolling.

Recommendation: No changes needed. The value proposition is exceptionally clear — product category, target audience, and benefit are all visible above the fold.
Screenshot for Value Proposition

Pricing Access

high impact
10/10

Pricing page loads immediately at /pricing without any signup or email required. Reached in 1 click from the main navigation. The page shows three subscription tiers (Starter $49/mo, Pro $159/mo, Agency $499/mo) plus one-off audit options. Currency toggle between GBP and USD is available. No gate or barrier to view pricing.

Recommendation: No changes needed. Pricing is fully accessible in one click with no barriers.
Screenshot for Pricing Access

Trial/Signup CTA

high impact
10/10

The primary CTA 'RUN A FREE QUICK CHECK' is prominently visible above the fold in a bold red button. Below it, the text reads 'Free. Results emailed in under a minute. No credit card required.' making it crystal clear this is a free trial. A secondary link 'Or skip ahead to a Full audit from £19 →' is also visible. The CTA is unambiguous about what happens (free quick check, results emailed).

Recommendation: No changes needed. The CTA is highly visible, clearly labeled as free, and sets expectations about what happens next.
Screenshot for Trial/Signup CTA

Signup Form

high impact
10/10

The signup form at /user/signup loads cleanly with just 1 required field: EMAIL ADDRESS. It also offers 'Sign up with Google' as an alternative. The email field accepted input (agent@agentchecker.ai entered successfully). The form uses a magic-link/code approach ('SEND CODE' button) rather than a password field, which is very low friction. No phone number, credit card, or excessive fields required. The form is minimal and agent-friendly.

Recommendation: No changes needed. The signup form is exceptionally minimal with just one field and a Google OAuth option. The magic-link approach eliminates password friction.
Screenshot for Signup Form

Documentation Access

high impact
10/10

Documentation is fully accessible at /docs without any login required. The docs index page shows organized categories: GUIDES (Run your first audit, Reading your report, Monitoring, White-label, Agency programme) and API REFERENCE. Clicking 'Run your first audit' loads a detailed article explaining Quick check vs Full audit with step-by-step instructions. Content is well-structured with breadcrumbs (Documentation / Guides), clear headings, and numbered steps. An agent could easily answer 'how do I...' questions from these docs.

Recommendation: No changes needed. Documentation is well-organized, publicly accessible, and contains concrete step-by-step guidance.
Screenshot for Documentation Access

Contact/Sales Form

high impact
10/10

The Book a Demo page at /book-a-demo serves as the contact/sales form. Fields: Your name, Work email (required), Company, Site you want audited, When suits you? (dropdown with options: Morning UK time, Afternoon UK time, Evening UK time, Any time you pick), and Anything you want us to cover? (textarea). All fields accepted input successfully. The dropdown works as a native select. The 'WHAT HAPPENS NEXT' box sets clear expectations. Form is highly usable with clear labels and logical field order.

Recommendation: No changes needed. The contact/sales form is well-designed with clear labels, a working dropdown, and explicit next-step expectations.
Screenshot for Contact/Sales Form

Site Search

high impact
10/10

A search modal is accessible via the search icon in the header on every page. Typing 'API' returned immediately relevant results organized by category: Pages (Integrations - 'Webhooks, the REST API, the MCP server...') and Documentation (API authentication, Connect the API, API errors). Results appear instantly as you type with descriptive snippets. Search covers pages, docs, and blog content. Highly functional and agent-friendly.

Recommendation: No changes needed. Site search is excellent — accessible from every page, returns categorized results instantly, and covers all content types.
Screenshot for Site Search

Plan Comparison

medium impact
10/10

Three subscription tiers are clearly shown: (1) Starter $49/mo - 3 sites monitored, 3 Full audits/month, daily/weekly/monthly Quick checks, drift alerts by email, audit history & trend; (2) Pro $159/mo - 10 sites monitored, 10 Full audits/month, portfolio cockpit, white-label PDF + branded reports, per-tool recurring schedules; (3) Agency $499/mo - 30 sites monitored, 30 white-label audits/month, 5 team seats, portfolio cockpit + bulk import. One-off audits also available. For a 10-person team, the Pro plan ($159/mo) would suit if they manage multiple client sites, or Starter if just monitoring their own site. Actual prices are shown, no 'Contact Sales' required.

Recommendation: No changes needed. Plan differentiation is clear with concrete feature counts and pricing. The 'For freelancers with client sites' descriptor on Pro helps agents recommend the right tier.
Screenshot for Plan Comparison

Demo Booking

medium impact
10/10

The demo booking page at /book-a-demo loads a clean form with fields: Your name, Work email (required), Company, Site you want audited, When suits you? (dropdown), and Anything you want us to cover? (textarea). The 'WHAT HAPPENS NEXT' box clearly explains: 1) No account or card needed, 2) Email within one working day with time and joining link, 3) 30-minute walkthrough on your own site. Availability is stated as Monday to Friday, 9am to 6pm UK time. Email field accepted input successfully. The form is highly usable and expectations are clearly set.

Recommendation: No changes needed. The demo booking form is excellent — clear fields, explicit next steps, and availability hours stated.
Screenshot for Demo Booking

API Documentation

medium impact
10/10

API documentation is publicly accessible at /docs#authentication without any login. The docs include: Authentication (API key via X-API-Key header or Bearer token, with curl examples), Rate limits (30 requests/minute, with X-RateLimit headers), Scan a URL endpoint, Webhooks, and Errors. Code examples are shown in curl format. Authentication is clearly explained: 'Every request must carry an API key. Generate one from your dashboard — the full key is shown once at creation time.' Error codes (401, 403, 429) are documented. Excellent API documentation for developers.

Recommendation: No changes needed. API docs are comprehensive, publicly accessible, and include working code examples with authentication, rate limits, and error handling.
Screenshot for API Documentation

Cancellation & Refunds

medium impact
10/10

The pricing page FAQ clearly answers both questions: (1) Cancellation: 'Can I change cadence or cancel any time?' - Yes, via the Stripe customer portal, takes effect at end of current billing period. (2) Refunds: 'Cancel a subscription any time and you keep access until the end of the period you have already paid for. We do not refund the unused part of a period, and prepaid audit credits are non-refundable, though they never expire. If an audit fails or produces a broken report, that is on us: tell us and we will re-run it or return the credit. UK and EU consumers buying for personal use also keep their statutory 14-day cancellation right.' Policy is comprehensive and clearly stated.

Recommendation: No changes needed. Cancellation and refund policies are clearly stated in the pricing FAQ with specific details about billing periods, credit expiry, and statutory rights.
Screenshot for Cancellation & Refunds

Support Channels

medium impact
10/10

The support page at /support lists three channels with explicit availability and response times: (1) Email (hello@agentchecker.ai) - Monday to Friday, 9am to 6pm UK time, first reply within one working day; (2) Live chat - chat bubble in bottom-right corner, Monday to Friday 9am-6pm UK, usually minutes during hours; (3) From inside your account - same routes with audit context, first reply within one working day. Hours and response times are clearly stated for each channel. A live chat widget is present on every page. No phone support offered.

Recommendation: No changes needed. Support channels are exceptionally well documented with specific availability hours and response time commitments for each channel.
Screenshot for Support Channels

Conclusion

Completed 17 audit checks in single session.

Is your site ready for AI agents?

Run a free Quick check and find out where your site stands.

Run a free Quick check →

Want the full picture? A Full audit sends a real AI agent through search, sign-up and checkout on your live site. From £19, and every audit includes 3 months of monitoring. See Full audit pricing →

Run an agency? Deliver reports like this under your own brand →